Comments on: destroy me this way http://protovietic.wordpress.com/2009/06/13/destroy-me-this-way/ a liquid archive Fri, 11 Dec 2009 03:10:53 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: protovietic http://protovietic.wordpress.com/2009/06/13/destroy-me-this-way/#comment-953 protovietic Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:50:03 +0000 http://protovietic.wordpress.com/?p=570#comment-953 i don't have any additional info on the contract. must confess, my interest was entirely personal since it answered a question i had wondered about in the past. i don’t have any additional info on the contract. must confess, my interest was entirely personal since it answered a question i had wondered about in the past.

]]> By: Joe http://protovietic.wordpress.com/2009/06/13/destroy-me-this-way/#comment-952 Joe Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:49:18 +0000 http://protovietic.wordpress.com/?p=570#comment-952 Convict labor a positive outlet, usually low risk, minimum security offenders are involved. Convict labor a positive outlet, usually low risk, minimum security offenders are involved.

]]> By: Ken http://protovietic.wordpress.com/2009/06/13/destroy-me-this-way/#comment-951 Ken Mon, 15 Jun 2009 01:26:05 +0000 http://protovietic.wordpress.com/?p=570#comment-951 Startling about the convict labor install at UW, when was it installed and do you know who the manufacturer was? Want to avoid them in the future if we have any simliar projects. Thanks, Ken Startling about the convict labor install at UW, when was it installed and do you know who the manufacturer was? Want to avoid them in the future if we have any simliar projects.

Thanks,
Ken

]]>